Discretely meshed models have several variations which utilize a combination of beam and shell elements - as shown below using Nastran terminology. For all discrete modeling techniques, the skins are represented using shell elements.
For proper loads processing assumptions, the shell element normal vectors should point "out" of the aeroshell (same as smeared panels).
The choice of technique will affect which cross-section variables can be optimized.
Note
When the stiffener space or height value is needed for loads processing, HyperX will automatically calculate them based on element areas.
The Panel Segment dimensions (\(A_{seg,L}\), \(A_{seg,R}\), \(L_{seg}\), \(w_L\), \(w_R\)) are required to compute the Panel Segment forces, see below.
The Segment dimensions are computed directly in HyperX based on the length and area of the prescribed FEM elements.
Computing the Spacing
The skin segment areas are calculated by summing the element area. Where the subscripts 'L' and 'R' denote the elements in the left skin and right skin segments respectively.
\(A_{seg,L}=\sum A_{e,L}\)
\(A_{seg,R}=\sum A_{e,R}\)
The segment length is the sum of the length of the stiffener segment elements.
\(L_{seg} = \sum L_e\)
The skin segment widths are calculated from the skin segment area and stringer segment length.
\(W_L=\frac{A_{seg,L}}{L_{seg}}\)
\(W_R=\frac{A_{seg,R}}{L_{seg}}\)
The spacing span for left and right skin are equivalent to the skin segment widths.
Computing Panel Height for Tech3 Segments
The panel height for discrete modeling Techniques 3 and 4 is calculated from the FEM grid spacing, skin and cap thickness defined for concept and the skin offset.
\(H_{panel} = B_H + T_{skin} + Z_{off} + (1/2)T_{cap}\)
This calculation does not account for Z offsets on the bottom flange.
Overwrite the Spacing and Height
The height and spacing calculations are overwritten if the following Advanced Settings option is set = No.
The user may then manually define the stiffener height in the Design Property. The stiffener spacing (skin widths) is defined separately for each skin by setting the X and Y buckling spans on the skin segment component on the Panel Settings Form.
Panel Segments are constructed by assigning shell and beam elements corresponding to the objects of the Stiffened Panel - skin, flange, web etc. The following tables show which objects are assigned for each modeling technique (per family, per concept).
Technique 2, Uniaxial Stiffened
|
Available Panel Concepts |
Bonded |
Fastened |
L/R Open Span (Shell) |
Stiffener (Full Beam) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blade Stiffened |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
||
|
I Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Flange Top* Web Flange Bottom |
|
T Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Flange Top* Web |
|
Inverted T Stiffened |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web Flange Bottom |
||
|
Z Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Flange Top* Web Flange Bottom |
|
J Stiffened |
Yes |
No |
(L) and/or (R) |
Flange Top* Web Flange Bottom |
|
C Stiffened |
Yes |
No |
(L) and/or (R) |
Flange Top* Web Flange Bottom |
|
Integral L Stiffened |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web Flange Bottom |
||
|
Angle Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Flange Top* Web |
Note
For bonded panel concepts, the flange top and open span skin objects are combined to form the bonded combo object.
Technique 2, Hat Stiffened
|
Available Panel Concepts |
Bonded |
Fastened |
L/R Open Span (Shell) |
Stiffener (Full Beam) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hat Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Closed Span Flange Top (L)* Flange Top (R)* Web (L) Web (R) Crown Bottom |
Note
For bonded panel concepts, the flange top and open span skin objects are combined to form the bonded combo object.
Technique 3, Uniaxial Stiffened
|
Available Panel Concepts |
Bonded |
Fastened |
L/R Open Span (Shell) |
Web (Shell) |
Stiffener (Full Beam) |
Free Flange (Beam) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
Flange Top* |
Flange Bottom |
|
T Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
Flange Top* |
|
|
Inverted T Stiffened |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
Flange Bottom |
|||
|
Z Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
Flange Top* |
Flange Bottom |
|
J Stiffened |
Yes |
No |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
Flange Top* |
Flange Bottom |
|
C Stiffened |
Yes |
No |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
Flange Top* |
Flange Bottom |
|
Integral L Stiffened |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
Flange Bottom |
|||
|
Angle Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Web |
Flange Top* |
Note
For bonded panel concepts, the flange top and open span skin objects are combined to form the bonded combo object.
Technique 3, Hat Stiffened
|
Available Panel Concepts |
Bonded |
Fastened |
L/R Open Span (Shell) |
Hat Combined Flange (Beam) |
Hat Combined Web (Shell) |
Crown (Beam) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hat Stiffened |
Yes |
Yes |
(L) and/or (R) |
Flange Top (L)* Flange Top (R)* Closed Span |
Web (L) Web (R) |
Crown Bottom |
Note
For bonded panel concepts, the flange top and open span skin objects are combined to form the bonded combo object.
Comparison to Smeared
The primary advantage of using smeared models is that the models are much easier to construct. There is less labor involved in meshing because the grids do not have to be aligned with the stiffener spacing as required by the discrete techniques. Discrete modeling technique 3 requires that stiffener grids be located in the correct Z axis depth to represent the web height.
The primary advantage of discrete models is that unique stiffener buckling, crippling, strength, and local buckling margins of safety may be reported for each skin and stringer segment component. Additionally, the discrete techniques 2 and 3 will capture the effects of having non-uniformly spaced stiffeners and stiffener terminations.
Frozen Sizing Variables
Depending on the discrete modeling technique, certain Sizing variables are dependent on the mesh geometry. Therefore, these variables cannot be optimized (are frozen). Smeared modeling is valuable for preliminary design because all Sizing variables are available for optimization.
Frozen Sizing variables are automatically locked out so no values may be entered in the interface. The extracted value is returned from the FEM and reported on the Sizing form after analyzing.